On Friday, June 29, 2007, 12:36:34 PM, Martijn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> The most interesting questions is of course: what database? Perhaps
> someone here knows how to get the count(*) faster? you might want to
> do a select count(primary_key) instead of *.

> As an answer to your question: you could use Integer.MAX_VALUE.

The DB's Oracle (8i, I think), but the metadata approach doesn't help,
as if I'm using size, it should be the size for the filtered results,
which may be in effect, otherwise I might as well use a fixed result.

What I was wondering was if anyone had any suggestions about a table
object that just did 'next'/'prev' paging, rather than working out
"Page N of M", although I'll try & work out if "select count(id)" is
faster/less cost than "select count(*)"

/Gwyn


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Reply via email to