Gwyn Evans wrote: > What I was wondering was if anyone had any suggestions about a table > object that just did 'next'/'prev' paging, rather than working out > "Page N of M", although I'll try & work out if "select count(id)" is > faster/less cost than "select count(*)"
In the past we didn't think there was much call for this, but we may well have been wrong. There is an issue for this. Please vote if you want it sorting. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-579 Regards, Al ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
