> Well, it's just the same as initializing numbers to 0 - cppcheck is > complaining, so I'm trying to get rid of that noise in the report.
That would be wrong though - plain old datatypes (POD) are not initialized in cpp, so numbers are indeed a random value if not properly initialized. std::string is a class, not a POD though so its constructor is always run. If cppcheck complains about this it would be wrong. I wonder if it is worthwhile to clutter the code with unnecessary (and for std::string even slightly decremental) changes to appease the tool. -- https://code.launchpad.net/~widelands-dev/widelands/bug-986611-cppcheck-uninitialized-variables/+merge/326256 Your team Widelands Developers is subscribed to branch lp:~widelands-dev/widelands/bug-986611-cppcheck-uninitialized-variables. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~widelands-dev Post to : widelands-dev@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~widelands-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
