You need rhombohedral coordinates (as the stucteditor says):
 > O1:   0.1295 0.1295 0.1295
 > Fe:   0.2141 0.2141 0.2141


Am 05.12.2011 11:24, schrieb Qiwen YAO:
> Dear all,
> I have been facing a few compounds that I am unable to do the initialization 
> (using w2web) for the calculation.
>
> The problem is:
> I was facing both "core leak out of sphere, and  RMT Sums Greater than 
> NN-DIST" at the same time.
>
> A recent example: I am trying to do an calculation initialization on the 
> LuFe2O4  (R-3m group) crystal (cell parameters are from the Pearson's Crystal 
> Data sheet 382676, a=b=0.3435nm, c=2.525nm, Alpha=Beta=90 degree, Theta=120 
> degree. Atomic positions:
> O1: 0  0  0.1295
> Fe:  0  0  0.2141
> O2: 0  0  0.2914
> Lu:  0  0  0
> ).
>
> Using the WIEN default RMT values and the default ENERGY to separate core and 
> valence states (-6) , I was facing core electrons leak out of MT-sphere  
> message for all four atoms. So I go back to the<x start>  step and change the 
> separation energy to the lowest possible value (-10 in this case) - if going 
> any lower than -10, I will be seeing the error message after running<x 
> start>, like these:
>
> forrtl: severe (24): end-of-file during read, unit -4, file stdin
> error: command   /home/wen/WIEN2K11/wien2k11install/lstart lstart.def   failed
>
> So, the natural step I took next is to increase the RMT values for the atoms 
> correspondingly (according to each atom's core leak value). Then I am facing 
> an another problem:  If I am to increase the RMT values too large, then in 
> the<x nn>  step I will be seeing errors like
>
> ERROR !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>   RMT(  1)=0.53000 AND RMT(  1)=0.53000
>   SUMS TO 1.06000 GT NNN-DIST= 0.84061
>
> But if the RMT value is not increased enough then the core leaking message 
> will still be there.
>
> So how would I solve such problems? I have been facing these for a few 
> compounds - for example, the other compound I tried was BiAlO3 which would 
> lead me to the same bottle-neck problem.
>
> Is there an automatic approaching way that I can take to get rid of both 
> error message at the same time? For cases like these, if there is no 
> practical solution to the initialization would that means the unit cell 
> parameters were out of touch (reality)?
>
> Thank you for reading. I have been searching the archive for a solution but 
> no luck.
>
> Kind regards,
> Wen
>
> **********************************************************
>
> Dr QiWen YAO
> JSPS Fellow
> Multifunctional Materials Group
> Optical and Electronic Materials Unit
> Environment and Energy Materials Research Division
>
> National Institute for Materials Science
>
> 1-2-1 Sengen, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0047, Japan
> Phone: +81-29-851-3354, ext. no. 6482, Fax: +81-29-859-2501
>
> **********************************************************
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wien mailing list
> Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
> http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien

-- 

                                       P.Blaha
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter BLAHA, Inst.f. Materials Chemistry, TU Vienna, A-1060 Vienna
Phone: +43-1-58801-165300             FAX: +43-1-58801-165982
Email: blaha at theochem.tuwien.ac.at    WWW: http://info.tuwien.ac.at/theochem/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to