My rmt is 1.01 without any reduction.
 

    On Tuesday, 7 November 2017 7:31 PM, Laurence Marks 
<[email protected]> wrote:
 

 You do not need want RKMAX 6.5 for O2, because you will need RMTs of about 
1.2. 6.0 or 5.75 will be fine. BUT you have to use the same O RMT & RKMAX for 
the oxide.
You need more computing resources.




On Nov 7, 2017 13:46, "chin Sabsu" <[email protected]> wrote:

Thank you Sir,
runsp_lapw -it gave me an error:  foreach. So I am running with runsp_lapw .... 
 script. 

If I run it with Rkmax=6 then it does not show me any warning. At the FAQ of 
Wienk page standard RMT for O is 6.5 but it also gave me RKmax reduced warning.

If someone advises me that I can take RKMAX=6 for O2 system then only I can 
proceed.
I do not have any good facility.




On Tuesday, 7 November 2017 6:59 PM, Gavin Abo <[email protected]> wrote:


To make that calculation feasible, it looks like you need a better computing 
system like a small cluster and mpi.If ~8 GB is your total RAM, keep in mind 
that the Linux operating might use around 1 GB.  Using top 
[https://superuser.com/ questions/282867/why-does-the- 
memory-usage-in-top-not-add-up ] or a system monitor [https://askubuntu.com/ 
questions/29757/what-can- replace-system-monitoring-in- 
the-top-gnome-panel-in-unity ], you can check for any unnecessary processes and 
kill them to try to gain back more "free" memory.  Though, while this might 
help a little with memory, it likely won't help with the speed issue.For speed, 
you likely need mpi or iterative diagonalization.  Are using iterative 
diagonalization (runsp -it) as was mentioned before:
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien. ac.at/pipermail/wien/2017- November/027303.htmlIf 
none of that helps, it looks like your stuck with doing less accurate 
calculations using small RKmax values.
On 11/6/2017 9:24 AM, chin Sabsu wrote:

Thank you Sir,

As per memory test, I got the figure: 46743  it means ~4.5 GB RAM is enough to 
run the case. But my system is having ~8 GB RAM:
7.6 GiB
Intel® Core™ i5-3570K CPU @ 3.40GHz × 4
Intel® Ivybridge Desktop


DearLyudmila Dobysheva
I increaseNMATMAX  upto45000 and NUME at 10000. At this value, it gave me lapw1 
error while at NMATMAX (NUME)=35000(8000) it taking too much time and even 
after three hrs lapw1 is running.

I want to keep consistent RKMAX with the literature. Otherwise, my job is to 
calculate the thermodynamic stability and for the same, I need the cohessive 
energy of O also.


Can I use RKmax 6.0 for O2 and for others I am tacking 7. If not then what 
should I do to run this O2 system?

Chin

______________________________ _________________
Wien mailing list
[email protected]. at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien. ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  http://www.mail-archive.com/ 
[email protected]. at/index.html




_______________________________________________
Wien mailing list
[email protected]
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/index.html


   
_______________________________________________
Wien mailing list
[email protected]
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/index.html

Reply via email to