Piotr's evaluation is very much in tone with what happens in Brazil, where
all journals are open access.

For journal publishing tools, most journals here use  the Public Knowledge
Project: http://pkp.sfu.ca/. I would also refer to you the SCIELO project
(again?):  http://www.scielo.org/php/index.php.

Indeed, costs would include revising, copydesk and page design - usually
covered here by a grant for a graduate student.

Juliana.

-- 
Profa. Dra. Juliana Bastos Marques
Departamento de História - CCH/UNIRIO

http://historiaunirio.com.br/
http://www.historiaunirio.com.br/numem/pesquisadores/julianamarques/
http://www.domusaurea.org/



On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Piotr Konieczny <[email protected]> wrote:

> Bills for what?
>
> Dead tree publication? Obsolete, switch to print on demand.
>
> Online publication? Once you have free access (no need to set up a "web
> shop" and collect money), web publishing is relatively simple. Hundreds of
> thousands if not millions have created web pages, and it is much easier to
> do so now than it was in the past. I wouldn't be surprised if there already
> was an OA journal friendly host and/or website creation kit; if there
> isn't, creating one wouldn't be a major problem (for the kit, free hosts
> like Google Sites are even less of an issue). If a given editing team has
> next to zero Internet literacy, ask among the grad students (hire one or
> get them to volunteer).
>
> Labor? As in authors? Editors? Reviewers? It's not like they are being
> paid under a current model.
>
> To sum it up, the only real cost associated with journal publishing is
> that of a single grad student who acts as an assistant/managing editor.
> That's the cost of about $1,000-$1,500 a month. That doesn't seem terrible,
> considering the potential sources of funding (universities, grants,
> professional associations and donations). And as much as I hate to say it,
> if this amount is really a problem (let the slaving grads starve...), that
> job could be outsourced for a fraction of that cost to somebody through the
> Internet freelancing portals. Consider that you can hire people for $20-$30
> an hour for such tasks, and consider how many hours really go into this
> kind of a job...
>
>
> --
> Piotr Konieczny
>
> "To be defeated and not submit, is victory; to be victorious and rest on
> one's laurels, is defeat." --Józef Pilsudski
>
>
>
> On 5/21/2012 2:01 AM, Richard Jensen wrote:
>
>> Sorry Dario, you need  to look at it from the editors' and scholarls
>> point of view and not say you are thinking of the "taxpayer"--journal
>> prices have gone up but taxes have gone down, so that's not a real issue.
>> I've been on the editorial boards of eight scholarly journals & all would
>> be in real trouble on free access. Who would pay their bills?  Who would
>> pay their grad students?   Already they  are threatened by declining
>> university budgets and losing the subscription base would be a terrific
>> blow.  "Access for the "taxpayers" / "taxpayers pay twice" is  a rhetorical
>> tool designed to defund science. It is the professors and graduate students
>> who need the journals and who would be hurt when they close.
>>
>> Richard Jensen
>>
>> At 11:45 PM 5/20/2012, you wrote:
>>
>>> With all due respect, your statement is simply false and ill-informed.
>>> The NIH ­ as well as a growing number of large research institutions and
>>> funding bodies worldwide ­ has been mandating open access for 4 years and
>>> I'd like to see any evidence that this is "destroying peer review". There
>>> are many sustainable open access models that publishers and scholarly
>>> societies are adopting, the only thing this campaign is threatening is the
>>> taxpayer's obligation to pay twice for research they have already funded.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Dario
>>>
>>> On May 20, 2012, at 10:30 PM, Richard Jensen wrote:
>>>
>>> > that's a bad idea--it will destroy the financial base of thousands of
>>> journals and throw the whole science community into turmoil for years as
>>> the main quality control system --peer review--is destroyed.
>>> >
>>> > The alternative of direct government subsidy of journals is even more
>>> dangerous, as it will give politicians control over what gets published.
>>> >
>>> > Richard Jensen
>>> >
>>> > At 11:19 PM 5/20/2012, you wrote:
>>> >> (apologies for cross-posting)
>>> >>
>>> >> A petition you should care about: require free access over the
>>> Internet to journal articles arising from taxpayer-funded research.
>>> >>
>>> >> http://access2research.org/
>>> >> http://wh.gov/6TH
>>> >>
>>> >> 25,000 signatures in 30 days (by June 19) gets an official response
>>> from the White House.
>>> >>
>>> >> Dario
>>> >> ______________________________**_________________
>>> >> Wiki-research-l mailing list
>>> >> Wiki-research-l@lists.**wikimedia.org<[email protected]>
>>> >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/**mailman/listinfo/wiki-**research-l<https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > ______________________________**_________________
>>> > Wiki-research-l mailing list
>>> > Wiki-research-l@lists.**wikimedia.org<[email protected]>
>>> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/**mailman/listinfo/wiki-**research-l<https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l>
>>>
>>>
>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>> Wiki-research-l mailing list
>>> Wiki-research-l@lists.**wikimedia.org<[email protected]>
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/**mailman/listinfo/wiki-**research-l<https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> Wiki-research-l mailing list
>> Wiki-research-l@lists.**wikimedia.org<[email protected]>
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/**mailman/listinfo/wiki-**research-l<https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l>
>>
>>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Wiki-research-l mailing list
> Wiki-research-l@lists.**wikimedia.org<[email protected]>
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/**mailman/listinfo/wiki-**research-l<https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l>
>
_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

Reply via email to