Hi, Laura!

I wonder if a variable worth considering is the number of views of the DYK vs 
the average number of page views of the article(s) (per day/week/month or 
whatever) promoted by the DYK *before* the publication of the DYK (obviously 
this can only measured for expanded articles rather than new ones). The 
hypothesis here is that more popular topics make more popular DYKs.

Another interesting variable is number of page views of the article in the 
days/weeks/months after the DYK. It would be interesting to know the extent to 
which DYKs drive additional interest in the topic both in the short term and 
whether any increase in interest is sustained longer term. I would hypothesize 
any initial sharp increase during the DYK, with a sharp fall-off after the DYK 
finishes but with a small sustained elevation.

It would also be interesting to see if articles mentioned in DYKs show any 
increased edit activity OR the creation of new inbound links to the article in 
the short or long term, but I am less sure about what is the baseline for 
comparison (given that a DYK article will have recently been created or 
expanded, suggesting an abnormally high level of edit activity immediately 
preceding the DYK). Possible proxies are articles in the same categories?

Kerry

Sent from my iPad

On 03/08/2013, at 6:04 PM, Laura Hale <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I posted research about the factors that may impact English Wikipedia Did You 
> Know article traffic on the day.   Because the research is a bit long, a copy 
> of it can be found at 
> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Anatomy_of_English_Wikipedia_Did_You_Know_traffic
> 
> Summary: This research examines the traffic of 544 English Wikipedia Did You 
> Knows to try to determine which variables play a role in the determining the 
> number of page views an article will get on the day. It largely concludes 
> that the number of dependent and independent variables make it to difficult 
> to isolate specific reasons why one type of article performs better than 
> another, though there are some general time and topics that will likely 
> result in greater views.
> 
> Any feedback is appreciated either here, on the research talk page or 
> privately.
> 
> Sincerely,
> Laura Hale
> 
> 
> -- 
> twitter: purplepopple
> blog: ozziesport.com
> _______________________________________________
> Wiki-research-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

Reply via email to