Makes sense! I actually hadn't factored in that sort of action
(although it does happen), more: the order of the main page links on
the root www.wikipedia.org page.

On 7 May 2015 at 03:51, Scott Hale <computermacgy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The accept-language header is the obvious place to start, but there is amble
> scope to combine multiple approaches together.
>
> In addition to accept-language and geolocation data, any logged in user will
> have view/edit history related to multiple editions. If the user is
> requesting a specific article, (e.g., https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/普天間飛行場
> ) we also can take account of what editions actually have the article ---
> the vast majority of content on Wikipedia only exists in one language or a
> few languages. (I.e., the above link redirects me to create the article on
> en-wiki although it exists on ja-wiki and Japanese is my second preferred
> language by my accept-language header and is an edition I edit captured in
> my edit history)
>
> This isn't an either-or question of which to use, but rather a question of
> how all these indicators can be used together to create the best experience.
> I would venture that most users don't change their accept-language header
> (not even possible on some mobile browsers!) and hence probably list give
> only one language. If so, geography and edit history can be signals for
> possible second languages beyond the one language in the accept-language
> header when hitting the homepage without a specific article.
>
> Cheers,
> Scott
>
> P.S. It looks like the Universal Language Selector already uses the
> accept-language header for its preference screen.
>
> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 5:58 AM, Oliver Keyes <oke...@wikimedia.org> wrote:
>>
>> As I've now said...4 times, I don't think we'd be using geolocation.
>> We'd be using the accept-language header. See
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_HTTP_header_fields#Accept-Language
>>
>> On 7 May 2015 at 00:52, WereSpielChequers <werespielchequ...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > When a reader comes to Wikipedia from the web we can detect their IP
>> > address and that usually geolocates them to a country. More often than not
>> > that then tells you the dominant language of that country.
>> >
>> > If we were to default to official or dominant languages then I predict
>> > endless arguments as to which language(s) should be the default in which
>> > countries. The large expat community in some parts of the Arab world might
>> > prefer English over Arabic. India would want to do things by state, and a
>> > whole new front would emerge in the Israeli Palestine debate.
>> >
>> > Regards
>> >
>> > Jonathan Cardy
>> >
>> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wiki-research-l mailing list
> Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
>



-- 
Oliver Keyes
Research Analyst
Wikimedia Foundation

_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

Reply via email to