They did; DOAJ seems to have been the method used to determine whether a journal was OA or not (which is fair enough).
Andrew. On 21 August 2015 at 12:50, Federico Leva (Nemo) <[email protected]> wrote: > Andrew Gray, 20/08/2015 14:21: >> >> They worked on a journal basis, classing them as "OA" or "not OA". > > > Weird, why didn't they just use DOAJ? https://doaj.org/ > > Nemo > > > _______________________________________________ > Wiki-research-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l -- - Andrew Gray [email protected] _______________________________________________ Wiki-research-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
