Hoi,
Such approaches ass-ume that we know best and promptly forget that the
world changes and that this attitude prevents "us" from arguing, poking at
the holy cows.
What if BIG contributors and Jane or me tell you that you are wrong? Would
you listen do you listen?? Yes we have our arguments ready!
Thanks,
GerardM
On 19 October 2015 at 07:13, Jane Darnell <[email protected]> wrote:
> Most interesting slide from that deck is this one:
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:WikiConference_USA_-_Community_Health.pdf&page=20
>
> I would say as a Wikipedian, I am firmly a member of the top bar there:
> COI (love to edit Haarlem articles b/c I live there), Disruptive editing
> (accused of this b/c I love other projects that most Wikipedians don't
> edit, like Commons and Wikidata), Gaming the system (I love games, such as
> publicizing things on Wikipedia to see if it makes a difference, and over
> time it generally does), Difficult users (I think all Wikipedians are
> entrepreneurs in the sense that they work alone and don't take no for an
> answer, like me)
>
> If you want to work on removing Wikipedians in that bar, please be aware
> you're talking about me. And if you send a coach to fix me, then I will
> soon be moving into the orange and red zones!
>
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 3:52 AM, Pine W <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Forwarding this interesting presentation's slide deck from Haitham.
>>
>>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:WikiConference_USA_-_Community_Health.pdf
>>
>> Pine
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wiki-research-l mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wiki-research-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
>
>
_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
