definitely! I am all for arguments - I guess the problem is tone, and how
to interpret it

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 8:40 AM, Pine W <[email protected]> wrote:

> I think we should have arguments about whether we are allowed to have
> arguments. ;)
>
> On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 11:29 PM, Gerard Meijssen <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hoi,
>> Such approaches ass-ume that we know best and promptly forget that the
>> world changes and that this attitude prevents "us" from arguing, poking at
>> the holy cows.
>>
>> What if BIG contributors and Jane or me tell you that you are wrong?
>> Would you listen do you listen?? Yes we have our arguments ready!
>> Thanks,
>>        GerardM
>>
>> On 19 October 2015 at 07:13, Jane Darnell <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Most interesting slide from that deck is this one:
>>>
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:WikiConference_USA_-_Community_Health.pdf&page=20
>>>
>>> I would say as a Wikipedian, I am firmly a member of the top bar there:
>>> COI (love to edit Haarlem articles b/c I live there), Disruptive editing
>>> (accused of this b/c I love other projects that most Wikipedians don't
>>> edit, like Commons and Wikidata), Gaming the system (I love games, such as
>>> publicizing things on Wikipedia to see if it makes a difference, and over
>>> time it generally does), Difficult users (I think all Wikipedians are
>>> entrepreneurs in the sense that they work alone and don't take no for an
>>> answer, like me)
>>>
>>> If you want to work on removing Wikipedians in that bar, please be aware
>>> you're talking about me. And if you send a coach to fix me, then I will
>>> soon be moving into the orange and red zones!
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 3:52 AM, Pine W <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Forwarding this interesting presentation's slide deck from Haitham.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:WikiConference_USA_-_Community_Health.pdf
>>>>
>>>> Pine
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Wiki-research-l mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wiki-research-l mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wiki-research-l mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wiki-research-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
>
>
_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

Reply via email to