I see that the upcoming Metrics Meeting will include a research presentation about the Teahouse. Any chance of having ORES presented at the January Metrics Meeting? :)
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 5:27 PM, Dario Taraborelli < [email protected]> wrote: > We just published an announcement on the Wikimedia blog marking the > official launch of revision scoring as a service > <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Revision_scoring_as_a_service> and > I wanted to say a few words about this project: > > Blog post: > https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/11/30/artificial-intelligence-x-ray-specs/ > Docs on Meta: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/ORES > > First off: what’s revision scoring > <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Revision_scoring_as_a_service#Rationale>? > On the surface, it’s a set of open APIs allowing you to automatically > “score” any edit and measure their probability of being damaging or > good-faith contributions. The real goal behind this project, though, is to > fix the damage indirectly caused by vandal-fighting bots and tools on > good-faith contributors and to bring back a collaborative dimension to how > we do quality control on Wikipedia. I invite you to read the whole blog > post > <https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/11/30/artificial-intelligence-x-ray-specs/> > if > you want to know more about the motivations and expected outcome of this > project. > > I am thrilled this project is coming to fruition and I’d like to > congratulate Aaron Halfaker > <https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/User:Ahalfaker> and all the project > contributors > <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Revision_scoring_as_a_service#Team> > on > hitting this big milestone: revision scoring started as Aaron’s side > project well over a year ago and it has been co-designed (as in – literally > – conceived, implemented, tested, improved and finally adopted) by a > distributed team of volunteer developers, editors, and researchers. We > worked with volunteers in 14 different Wikipedia language editions and as > of today revision scores are integrated > <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Revision_scoring_as_a_service#Tools_that_use_ORES> > in > the workflow of several quality control interfaces, WikiProjects and 3rd > party tools. The project would not have seen the light without the > technical support provided by the TechOps team (Yuvi in particular) and > seminal funding provided by the WMF IEG program and Wikimedia Germany. > > So, here you go: the next time someone tells you that LLAMAS GROW ON TREES > <https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=642215410> you can > confidently tell them they should stop damaging > <http://ores.wmflabs.org/scores/enwiki/damaging/642215410/> Wikipedia. > > Dario > > > *Dario Taraborelli *Head of Research, Wikimedia Foundation > wikimediafoundation.org • nitens.org • @readermeter > <http://twitter.com/readermeter> > > > _______________________________________________ > Analytics mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics > >
_______________________________________________ Wiki-research-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
