Oooh! That sounds like a good idea. Fun story: I presented the idea and the proof of concept service at the metrics meeting last January. :)
I'll look into it. Thanks for the suggestion Pine. On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 2:16 PM, Pine W <[email protected]> wrote: > I see that the upcoming Metrics Meeting will include a research > presentation about the Teahouse. Any chance of having ORES presented at the > January Metrics Meeting? :) > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 5:27 PM, Dario Taraborelli < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> We just published an announcement on the Wikimedia blog marking the >> official launch of revision scoring as a service >> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Revision_scoring_as_a_service> and >> I wanted to say a few words about this project: >> >> Blog post: >> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/11/30/artificial-intelligence-x-ray-specs/ >> Docs on Meta: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/ORES >> >> First off: what’s revision scoring >> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Revision_scoring_as_a_service#Rationale>? >> On the surface, it’s a set of open APIs allowing you to automatically >> “score” any edit and measure their probability of being damaging or >> good-faith contributions. The real goal behind this project, though, is to >> fix the damage indirectly caused by vandal-fighting bots and tools on >> good-faith contributors and to bring back a collaborative dimension to how >> we do quality control on Wikipedia. I invite you to read the whole blog >> post >> <https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/11/30/artificial-intelligence-x-ray-specs/> >> if >> you want to know more about the motivations and expected outcome of this >> project. >> >> I am thrilled this project is coming to fruition and I’d like to >> congratulate Aaron Halfaker >> <https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/User:Ahalfaker> and all the >> project contributors >> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Revision_scoring_as_a_service#Team> >> on >> hitting this big milestone: revision scoring started as Aaron’s side >> project well over a year ago and it has been co-designed (as in – literally >> – conceived, implemented, tested, improved and finally adopted) by a >> distributed team of volunteer developers, editors, and researchers. We >> worked with volunteers in 14 different Wikipedia language editions and as >> of today revision scores are integrated >> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Revision_scoring_as_a_service#Tools_that_use_ORES> >> in >> the workflow of several quality control interfaces, WikiProjects and 3rd >> party tools. The project would not have seen the light without the >> technical support provided by the TechOps team (Yuvi in particular) and >> seminal funding provided by the WMF IEG program and Wikimedia Germany. >> >> So, here you go: the next time someone tells you that LLAMAS GROW ON >> TREES <https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=642215410> you >> can confidently tell them they should stop damaging >> <http://ores.wmflabs.org/scores/enwiki/damaging/642215410/> Wikipedia. >> >> Dario >> >> >> *Dario Taraborelli *Head of Research, Wikimedia Foundation >> wikimediafoundation.org • nitens.org • @readermeter >> <http://twitter.com/readermeter> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Analytics mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Wiki-research-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l > >
_______________________________________________ Wiki-research-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
