Hi Heather!

I've been working on methods for measuring content gaps and showing when
they appeared and were closed.

See https://blog.wikimedia.org/2017/03/07/the-keilana-effect/ for a summary
and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Interpolating_quality_
dynamics_in_Wikipedia_and_demonstrating_the_Keilana_Effect for a long-form
discussion of the methods.

I've got a complete dataset of per-article quality assessments for all
articles in English Wikipedia

Halfaker, Aaron; Sarabadani, Amir (2016): Monthly Wikipedia article quality
predictions. figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.3859800.v3

I'm working hard to get that dataset hosted on Quarry so that it would be
easier experiment with for arbitrary new cross-sections by anyone who is
interested.  But we've hit some technical hurdles.  See
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T146718

On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 12:29 PM, Andrew Krizhanovsky <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Great project! Thank you for information.
>
> There is the discussion about the multilingual project name at page 33-34.
> I like the name Wikischool :)
>
> Best regards,
> Andrew Krizhanovsky.
>
> On 4 May 2017 at 18:45, Ziko van Dijk <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Does it have to be Wikipedia? Wikipedia is a reference work for
> > "everybody", but not especially written for pupils in the primary
> education.
> >
> > We discussed this kind of issues at the foundation of the Klexikon, see
> our
> > report in English:
> > https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:English_version_
> Konzept_Wikipedia_f%C3%BCr_Kinder.pdf
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > Ziko
> >
> >
> >
> > 2017-05-04 14:44 GMT+02:00 Heather Ford <[email protected]>:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I've started working on a paper with folks who ran a fascinating project
> >> called "Wikipedia Primary School" [1] where they investigated different
> >> mechanisms or models for eliciting and developing Wikipedia content that
> >> was relevant to the South African national primary school curriculum. We
> >> are currently writing a paper that assesses each of the different types
> of
> >> "interventions" that were tested/tried out in trying to fill in these
> gaps
> >> - including editathons, contests and collaborations with scientific
> >> journals. It seems as though there are a host of different types of
> models
> >> that are used to fill in Wikipedia's gaps beyond the original "volunteer
> >> edits what interests them in their spare time" model (e.g. Wikipedians
> in
> >> residence, editing Wikipedia as part of class assignments). If anyone
> has
> >> any good references to work already undertaken in this area please let
> me
> >> know!
> >>
> >> Many thanks,
> >> Heather.
> >>
> >> [1] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_Primary_School
> >>
> >> Dr Heather Ford
> >> University Academic Fellow
> >> School of Media and Communications <http://media.leeds.ac.uk/>, The
> >> University of Leeds
> >> w: hblog.org / EthnographyMatters.net <http://ethnographymatters.net/>
> /
> >> t:
> >> @hfordsa <http://www.twitter.com/hfordsa>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Wiki-research-l mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wiki-research-l mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wiki-research-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
>
_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

Reply via email to