Does it expand an existing citation that someone else has created with "et al" which is the scenario here? My experience of it is that I can use it to expand an pre-existing naked URL citation (in some cases, exceptions being PDFs) but I've never seen a way to use it expand a partial citation to a more fullsome one.
Kerry Sent from my iPad > On 29 Aug 2019, at 10:35 pm, Federico Leva (Nemo) <[email protected]> wrote: > > Kerry Raymond, 29/08/19 01:26: > > So I think a specific tag to encourage the expansion of "Bloggs et al" > > citations to full author listings might work. > > But it's easier to fix it yourself, using the citation bot: > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:UCB > > Greg, 30/08/19 07:48: >> If the Wikipedia >> community is not studying its biases and designing tools and strategies for >> addressing them, it is not reflecting the world, but lagging behind it. > > However, going back to Kerry: > > > In some ways, I think a better solution might be to try to get Google > > scholar interested in the issue of gender. > > I'm not aware of studies of gender bias in Google Scholar search results > themselves, yet we'd really need such basic information before going into > specifics of how the research is consumed and redistributed. There is a > mention of gender in https://oadoi.org/10.1017/S104909651800094 which states > > > Moreover, because a GS pro- > > file is a public signal, it can have a disproportionate effect on > > opinions because a person seeing it knows that others also see > > it (Chwe 2016). > > Which seems to me an argument very similar to yours on Wikipedia. > > Federico > > _______________________________________________ > Wiki-research-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l _______________________________________________ Wiki-research-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
