https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4582
--- Comment #260 from Voyagerfan5761 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-12-02 00:30:37 UTC --- (In reply to comment #259) > (In reply to comment #257) > > That list seems to be missing the main one proposed, for which a patch has > > already been written: > > > > 7. [[date]] would autoformat but NOT link, just as [[image]] and > > [[category]] > > do something special and don't make a link, while [[:date]] would link but > > not > > autoformat (just as [[:image]] and [[:category]] create links but don't do > > anything special). If someone wants to link AND autoformat, which frankly > > would be kind of weird, they can use template code, examples of which have > > already been posted. > > That would be #2, "Keep the current syntax, remove the links: [[date]] would > continue to autoformat, but it wouldn't create a link" > So if #7 is the same as #2, and #7 already has a patch written for it, #2 already has a patch written. Since #(7|2) is also "the main one proposed", is there any reason the patch shouldn't be applied to allow this bug to be finally closed for good? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
