https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40270
--- Comment #27 from Dereckson <[email protected]> 2012-11-01 01:02:11 UTC --- I've a lot of difficulties to understand how a controversial change could get 93,9% support from 217 people. I understand your consensus argument, but when 217 people ignore yours arguments, there is a major issue. The definition of the consensus itself isn't consensual: some wikis would like to stress the fact a consensus isn't an unanimity, but a very wide agreement on a matter after a discussion. You could raise these concerns on ja.wiki and ask a formal process with several phases for future decisions (e.g. fr.wikipedia uses a process with three phases (1) discussion, generally during some weeks to analyse all the issues of a given problematic and determine vote modalities (2) the vote itself (3) result and application). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
