https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32906
--- Comment #24 from Liangent <[email protected]> 2012-11-10 18:19:42 UTC --- (In reply to comment #23) > Yes, it's a terrible abstraction violation worthy of great headdesks. :) > But... > it works for now, and documenting it means we can use it and can worry about > refactoring the guts later and replacing the implicit 'variant' parameter with > an explicit one that gets passed into the ParserOptions object cleanly. But refactoring may mean that we need to fix parser callers, and it may trash our work we do now attempting to use the implicit "variant" parameter. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
