https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38095
--- Comment #6 from Bawolff <[email protected]> 2012-11-20 16:05:25 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > This change was committed to Gerrit in > Ieace3cd6d57b56559555ae0f1e6ec130e5d25c85 (“Updated config files per current > usage”), changing > 'default' => true, // fixme: log things instead > to > 'default' => false, > > Was this really neccessary? Are the exception details somehow sensitive > (showing private information or something)? Or is it just about > user-friendliness (well, a fatal exception is hardly user-friendly)? Couldn’t > we just hide the exception details under a “click for technical details”, or > even into an HTML comment? > > You know, on a public _wiki_ running on open-source software, I might want to > diagnose the problem a bit myself, rather than just posting a hexnumber to > Bugzilla and waiting for someone with shell access to look it up in the server > logs… +5 billion. Getting the info from a sysadmin in some cases is more work then fixing the issue. Its also important to have this info to triage bugs. >Are the exception details somehow sensitive > (showing private information or something)? There was. My understanding is that issue has been fixed. (Exceptions in password related code was showing passwords) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
