https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5997
--- Comment #36 from Bill Mitchell <[email protected]> 2009-07-29 01:00:27 UTC --- Re comment #35. I'm happy to go along with community consensus. I think adopting an implementation of a facility allowing hidden declaration of ref body content outside of the wikitext prose would be a good thing, whether done via the "ref def" syntax which I implemented in bug# 18890 or with an alternative implementation. As I understand it, the alternative implementation limits the location of hidden ref body declarations to the references block, and omits the optional ability of editor control over the ordering of the expanded footnotes which the "ref def" implementation which I have online at at http://siteslot.com/testwiki2 provides, but if the community consensus is to forego that optional editor control ver ordering of the expanded footnotes, then that is the community consensus. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
