https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45861
--- Comment #30 from Robert Rohde <ro...@robertrohde.com> --- Lua tests: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bays_of_the_Philipines The presentation of the Lua-based coordinates is somewhat malformed, but still usable (whereas before they were simply absent). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climate_of_Russia The Lua-based climate boxes look great in PDF, but all the references embedded in the templates are absent from the References section. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_longest_bridges_in_the_world The Lua-based number formatting and conversions look perfect. However some of the non-Lua based references seem incorrect (e.g. #54). Complex, non-Lua test: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama On wiki there are 335 numbered notes, the PDF skips many of the numbers so that only 58 are actually present, and the numbers that are present don't match the wiki numbering. To be clear this is testing the Barack Obama article with _traditional template-based citations_. So whatever change was made appears to have caused problems with normal article rendering. So altogether these changes look like good progress towards handling Lua, BUT there also seem to be negative impacts the presentation of other unrelated page elements, especially references. This includes the traditional {{cite}} template-based references. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
