https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48378
--- Comment #3 from François <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #2) Thank you for your response! > Any reason? In some quick testing here, they're both about the same speed > (180-200µs each). It is nice then! I was thinking that - having 1 more argument - and replacing the match in the string in place of simply returning it would consume more resources. But it is probably optimised internally by Lua... > > OTOH, that would require callers to know whether they should call > mw.text.trim > or mw.text.utrim. Yes, like they have to choose between string or ustring library -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
