https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35785

--- Comment #65 from TMg <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to comment #64)
> Please [...] keep arguments neutral and technical.

But this is not a technical request. It's a request to change the settings of
each and every MediaWiki user without asking them and without any community
consensus. This is a social thing. It's about keeping things simple at a level
that each and every user can understand and grow up from. There are lots and
lots of reasons (both technical and social) to not do this but only very few
(if any) valid reasons to do it.

While this report is about "recentchanges" only it will change both
recentchanges and all watchlists. I'm pretty sure only a few experienced users
care about recentchanges. This report would be very different if you are able
to split this. But it's a big issue if it will affect the much more important
watchlists. Almost all users use their watchlists but only a few use
recentchanges. Reventchanges is the same for all users anyway.

The enhanced stuff is a tool for power users. It's an opt-in feature. It always
was an opt-in feature and always should be. Every user that really wants to use
it had it enabled already. There is no need to change anything from this
perspective. If you want to change your setting then change your setting. You
don't need to change the settings of everybody else to do this.

The enhanced stuff is supercharged with lots and lots of informations and
links. This is a good thing for power-users but confusing for new users. The
default lists are a lot easier to manage and to understand. Changing the
default setting will affect mainly new users. Power-users had it enabled
already. Again, from this perspective it doesn't make sense to change the
default setting from "easy" to "hard".

The basic lists don't rely on JavaScript. The enhanced stuff doesn't work well
with JavaScript disabled. It's not that it's a complete mess (like
LiquidThreads is) but it simply doesn't make much sense with JavaScript
disabled.

The scripting stuff feels clunky and slow, even on current machines. The
animations are unnecessary and disturbing. They are actually *broken* (see bug
#31832). Collapsing elements is *not* animated, it's just delayed for no
reason. It feels like my mouse click was not recognized. I click again and this
*collapses* the list immediately the moment it opened. Such bugs make me feel
like I'm to stupid to use a computer. Like I'm spastic and unable to do a
decent mouse click. I hate such bugs. Recentchanges and watchlist don't need to
be animated at all. Both are tools to get things done. Most animations add
nothing to these workflows. All they do is wasting time.

The scripting stuff is so bad, the watchlist becomes completely unusable for
some users. See the depending reports (e.g. bug #34876).

The enhanced stuff actually removes features. One is that the "hide my edits"
setting becomes pointless. If this setting is enabled and I edit a page, that
page will be completely removed from the basic watchlist. This is a useful
feature. For example, it's like I got a notification about a change on a talk
page, I added an answer and that's it. It's like a check mark. Done and gone.
My watchlist gets cleaner this way. The enhanced stuff not only removes this
feature, it gets completely confusing. If "hide my edits" is enabled only my
last edit will be hidden. Instead it shows the previous edits again. There is
not even a hint that there was a later edit. No "current" indicator or
something. It looks exactly the same like I never added an answer to that talk
page. This is confusing and makes the "hide my edits" setting completely
useless. Same problem in combination with other settings but that's the most
important for me.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l

Reply via email to