https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56070
--- Comment #11 from Greg Grossmeier <g...@wikimedia.org> --- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #6) > > Also on enwikisource, which is also a Cirrus-as-primary wiki. > > > > This seems like a good candidate for an associated test with the fix :) > > A little more detail: > > The test has existed for a long time, it has found bugs in search a number of > times. Awesome. Figured that's why you reported it. > In this particular instance, the bug was reported within hours of it being > introduced. It's a robust test. I'd love for it to be found *before* merge, in our grand and glorious future where all tests live in the repo of the code being tested (and where the devs of the code see the tests failing during development (through Gerrit)). I meant to direct my comment towards Chad/Nik in that as the QA team obviously did it's job well here. (In reply to comment #10) > The only reason this isn't fixed now is that box chad and I were at > conferences > yesterday. I'm still there today. Chad: Since you're back today, can you give me a go/no-go decision before 11am pacific (MW Core deploy window) on whether we should switch back to lucene on affected wikis? Don't want this to persist much longer. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
