https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56070
--- Comment #14 from Greg Grossmeier <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #12) > > I'd love for it to be found *before* merge, in our grand and glorious future > > where all tests live in the repo of the code being tested (and where the > > devs > > of the code see the tests failing during development (through Gerrit)). > > Well, CirrusSearch is sort of a unique situation, and having test2 answers > that > situation exactly. Not the pre-commit tests question, though.... which was my point ;) (And yes, I know we don't currently have the infra to run Cirrus tests like this quickly per patchset, but we should strive to get there, and this was a prod to do so.) > > Chad: Since you're back today, can you give me a go/no-go decision before > > 11am > > pacific (MW Core deploy window) on whether we should switch back to lucene > > on > > affected wikis? Don't want this to persist much longer. > > I'd vote for keeping CirrusSearch if we can, I don't think the lack of search > suggestions in the short term is a blocker. Yep, Chad just confirmed on IRC that after the rebuild he's running right now all should be fine. Everyone: let the bug know if in an hour you still see this bad behavior anywhere. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
