https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46306
--- Comment #74 from Isarra <zhoris...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to comment #71) > (In reply to comment #66) > > CSS and especially JS parts often timed > > out, though (and as far as I know ULS is a huge piece of JS adding > > substantial > > amounts of CSS) > > If that's the real issue, the answer here is further optimizing ULS load and > performance characteristics and eliminating the need for a preference. Are > there other reasons to want a preference beyond performance? It's a real issue. Another, more general, issue is that it adds an extra interface and fonts that for many users simply serves no purpose, or even makes things worse. There is enough clutter as is; when it comes to added features with specific use cases, folks should be able to remove what they don't use. Essentially this is a gadget in extension form, and follows, or should follow, many of the same principles. (It's true that if the first issue is resolved, it would then be more feasible for users to just hide that interface and such if desired, but such an approach is rather poor practice in the long run especially with relatively large objects such as this.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
