https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49494
--- Comment #17 from Nemo <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #15) > (In reply to comment #14) > > "shellpolicy" is not only about "community consensus needed" > > What else? (I can imagine a little bit, but your descriptive words might > simply > be helpful to improve this.) See comment 1, comment 7 and follow links; e.g. [[m:Limits to configuration changes]]. > >, moreover the new > > name is too broad and vague (despite being so long) and is already causing > > disruption (see bug 56346). I suggest reverting. > > How was the old name clearer? Or any other proposal you have in mind? The old name was clearer because it had a clear prefix, shell-, which clearly connected this keyword to its sibling (and opposite) "shell". I suggest to keep "shell" (or shell's new name) as prefix. If "policy" is not a clear word, we could use "on hold". So shell-onhold for instance. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
