https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49494
--- Comment #21 from MZMcBride <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #17) > The old name was clearer because it had a clear prefix, shell-, which clearly > connected this keyword to its sibling (and opposite) "shell". It's pretty lame that the keywords input on the Bugzilla form can't accept "consensus" as a match for "community-consensus-needed". The input appears to be strictly prefix-based for suggestions. > I suggest to keep "shell" (or shell's new name) as prefix. My general view here is that the keywords field is basically a tool for Bugzilla power-users and any random user who tries to use this field will invariably do it wrong. Even experienced users (like me!) will sometimes screw up, regardless of how clear the keyword _or_ its description text is. (And I agree that nobody ever reads these description texts.) Bugzilla keywords are simple markers of particular patterns. Let's not overcomplicate this. :-) shellpolicy was bad and community-consensus-needed is better. If we can find something even better than community-consensus-needed, we can use that. shell-onhold doesn't seem to be any better, though. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
