https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57569

--- Comment #16 from Equazcion <equazc...@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> I fully share this view.  I've been toying with the idea of an extension here
> for some time.  There is this new namespace, there is the new userright that
> the community agreed upon, there are the common complaints that AfC templates
> and scripts don't do this or that (and can't be modified as the wiki stands
> to
> without creating an on-by-default gadget or adding code to
> MediaWiki:Common.js
> or possibly by creating a guided tour (which is a fairly new option that was
> introduced as I've been developing the extension)).  There are a LOT of
> factors
> that need to go into draft creation alone, not to mention I think (as I
> stated
> in bug 57315) that I think requested articles could be rolled into articles
> for
> creation and the whole process could be streamlined.  I'm constantly seeing
> stuff about editor retention and we need to do this and that and that is
> great,
> but what I have a problem with is the fact that our current fairly difficult
> to
> use system turns new editors away... Maybe stating the obvious, but if there
> are fewer new editors, then there is a much smaller pool to work from for
> retention.

It's fine that you share Steven's view on that -- but the question was whether
these things are a block to the Draft namespace implementation. An extension
may be a good idea and I don't necessarily dispute that, but it wasn't part of
this proposal and it regards changes that should be proposed separately. I
might even support it, once it's clear what the proposed changes are (all I've
seen spelled out so far are a new landing page and some sort of special
permission changes, which are both still pretty vague).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l

Reply via email to