https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57569
--- Comment #23 from Nemo <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #22) > Ori's point was partly that acting in a hasty manner and populating the > namespace with content right, so that it's less flexible to essential changes > in the near future, *will* make the situation worse. Worse than hypothetical future is not worse than the present, so it's still a gradual improvement. Populating a "drafts" namespace doesn't seem to pose any risk to me: it's completely normal to move pages in and out new namespaces (Wikipedia<->Draft in this case) and this namespace is supposed to be purged regularly anyway. If you're so worried about workload, you can run a move script yourself when it's time; the only real risk when creating namespace is forgetting to run namespaceDupes.php. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
