https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53069

Quim Gil <q...@wikimedia.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Priority|High                        |Normal

--- Comment #19 from Quim Gil <q...@wikimedia.org> ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> Comment 7 was not an attempt to have a discussion, it was an attempt to
> lecture. Perhaps in your culture five consecutive bullets of "according to
> ..."
> constitutes a discussion, but I think it'd be better if you directly
> addressed
> the substantive points raised above or didn't post here.

Good discussions deserve good argumentation, and I did my best trying to
explain why you shouldn't keep reverting the priorities set by maintainers.

I have shared my humble opinion at Bug 53076 comment 12. This discussion about
anonymous mobile editing focuses on Wikimedia principles and needs. The
decision to restrict mobile editing to registered users is more strategic than
technical, and therefore (imho) that discussion belongs more to mobile-l,
wikimedia-l, Meta, etc than to MobileFrontend Bugzilla reports. The Mobile and
Design teams are basically executing according to that strategy. Challenge the
strategy, be convincing, and if/when anonymous mobile editing becomes a higher
priority for these teams then they will work accordingly.

In the meantime, any contributions to MobileFrontend improving the experience
of anonymous editing are welcome, and 3rd party MediaWikis might want to
benefit from them regardless of the decisions made in the Wikimedia context.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l

Reply via email to