https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40810
--- Comment #41 from Matthew Flaschen <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #40) > Right. I agree that to have the kind of flexibility we need, sitelinks > likely need to be able to have statements. To be clear, I mean this flexibility is probably required if Wikidata is to be a full representation of status items like Dario mentioned (protection, cleanup, etc.). This is relevant to GettingStarted, which uses such "needs cleanup" data. In the meantime, we have ideas for more incremental approaches that do not require such a new statement system. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
