https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51154
--- Comment #6 from SJ <[email protected]> --- Will Flow be applicable to all namespaces? There are lots of article-style pages that temporarily or permanently would benefit from inline comments in the middle of what is otherwise a full-text long-form page. In those cases* I don't see how the Flow design will help. Signatures are useful in most namespaces, whereas "idiosyncratic protocols and templates and formats", with unknown amounts of associated work, seem like higher-hanging tasty fleshy vegetalia. * Examples: wikis that don't separate talk from content; wikis that have two layers of talk: limited inline v. permanent talk-threads; articles or main pages that tabulate membership or participation or otherwise include tables that include user signatures. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
