https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51154
--- Comment #7 from Oliver Keyes <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #6) > Will Flow be applicable to all namespaces? There are lots of article-style > pages that temporarily or permanently would benefit from inline comments in > the > middle of what is otherwise a full-text long-form page. In those cases* I > don't see how the Flow design will help. Like what? Some examples, please? > > Signatures are useful in most namespaces, whereas "idiosyncratic protocols > and > templates and formats", with unknown amounts of associated work, seem like > higher-hanging tasty fleshy vegetalia. > Sure, and work on those namespaces is best done when we actually discuss _deploying_ in those namespaces - and when it is fully working for the primary target of the VE (i.e., the mainspace). > * Examples: wikis that don't separate talk from content; wikis that have two > layers of talk: limited inline v. permanent talk-threads; articles or main > pages that tabulate membership or participation or otherwise include tables > that include user signatures. Actual examples for each example...? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
