Isarra <> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|WONTFIX                     |---

--- Comment #56 from Isarra <> ---
(In reply to comment #52)
> Isarra's proposal is not reasonable. You want us to add logic for displaying
> the cookie expiration, while also saying "though what the boundary would be"
> for actually showing it is "up in the air". This is not a specification for a
> patch, it's vague handwaving.

Development is not an exact science. This is why iteration is so popular. If
you've ever done anything Agile, it's all about iteration.

Now I don't know what random number is best so I'm not going to specify a
specific random number, but at this point it really doesn't matter what it is
anyway. We need the logic first, and if the logic is there, we can then just
pick anything for the cutoff number, 182 days, a year, whatever. If it turns
out to be a bad number, people will complain and we can change it. An
iteration, see?

Changing a variable is easy. We do it all the time.

You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Wikibugs-l mailing list

Reply via email to