https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62323
--- Comment #12 from Richard Morris <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Gabriel Wicke from comment #9) > (In reply to Derk-Jan Hartman from comment #8) > > BTW, someone suggested the idea of a notice if the HTML was detected to be > > bad. I like that idea, but I would start with a console.log message or > > something, instead of a banner. Might help debugging pages easier. > > We already have this in the form of round-trip testing. How does round-trip testing help the end user. For example take https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=1983_San_Miguel_Beermen_season&oldid=597926082 among other problems this has broken tags with a line Carlson Samlani <sup> Acquired from defunct U-Tex Wranglers ,/sup> I'm not seeing anything in the console. That page actually had a worse bug, with a broken bit of markup in its infobox template. I've created a testpage using a sandboxed copy of the broken template https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Salix_alba/1983_San_Miguel_Beermen_season In the normal editor everything looks fine. In VE when you edit it the whole page is included in a single template and virtually impossible to edit. A normal editor coming to this page and trying to use VE is going to get very confused. A warning message might help. A console message might have helped with the debugging of the template. I've now fixed the template so things are fine now https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template%3AInfobox_PBA_season&diff=598663098&oldid=575403049 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
