https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58196
--- Comment #19 from Liangent <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Luis Villa (WMF Legal) from comment #18) > (In reply to Krinkle from comment #17) > > So if I understand correctly, the whitelist of properties you approved in > > comment 12 are in fact allowed for identifiable queries (e.g. with > > user_id/user name attached to it), as opposed to the anonymized view. > > Yes, that is correct, for those categories. > > As far as implementation, we'll want to review new fields as they are added, > which is why I prefer a whitelist approach (review what is released; hard to > accidentally release data accidentally) to a blacklist approach (review what > is not released; easy to release data accidentally by not adding it to the > blacklist). > > > And when you say "OK in principle" for the anonymized view, that means all > > properties? > > Yes, based on my understanding that they are already available on toolserver > in user_properties_anonym and/or via the API. If they aren't already public > (via API or toolserver) we should probably review one-by-one, and/or do a > more careful scrutiny of the anonymization procedures. Maybe that deserves a > separate bug? anonym on Toolserver is also whitelist based. I don't have access to the original list ts_global.user_properties_anonym_whilelist, but it's possible to sniff it with select distinct up_property from user_properties_anonym; (a slow query). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
