https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61380
--- Comment #27 from Vogone <leon.liese...@wikipedia.de> --- (In reply to billinghurst from comment #25) > Stewards reviewed this and do not believe that there is a community > consensus, nor that the community has sufficient active users to reach such > a valid consensus, especially when based upon a conversation based on > patriotic competition rather than a demonstrated need. > > Server: sh.wiktionary.org > No. of pages: 850,497 > No. of articles: 849,245 > No. of edits: 1,301,882 > No. of users: 1,591 > No. of active users: 16 (and noting that 4 of these are bots) > No. of group:autopatrolled: 0 > No. in group:sysop: 5 > No. in group:bureaucrat: 3 > No. in group:oversight: 0 > No. in group:checkuser: 0 > No. in group:bot = 10 > > and if you have a look at the recent edit count > https://sh.wiktionary.org/w/api. > php?action=query&list=allusers&auactiveusers&auwitheditsonly&aulimit=500&aupr > op=editcount > > shows that all users that require the rollback right, have it, there is no > demonstrated need. They would be well suited to implement an autopatrolled > right. Since the request for autpatrolled is valid (though community consensus is needed) according to you, I don't see how this bug is a WONTFIX … -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
