https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67270
--- Comment #15 from Mark A. Hershberger <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Greg Grossmeier from comment #11) > Is there a reason we didn't make the REL1_23 branch for these > remaining extensions at the same point in time as the 1.23 release? I thought I did. In fact, I specifically recall running the script Brian mentions. Still, the history in Gerrit shows I didn't run the script. Or, rather, the problems in Bug #64157 show that branching was done with the wrong date. Unfortunately, gerrit/git won't let me delete the bad branches. The easiest thing to do would be to drop those REL1_23 branches that don't have their own commits and recreate them. (In reply to Bawolff (Brian Wolff) from comment #14) > Why not just use the existing script [1] which has support (If I'm reading > it correctly) for branching extensions based on the timestamp of when core > branched? That script requires a configuration file that isn't documented. I have a shell script that does the same thing that doesn't require an un-documented configuration file. However a bug in my invocation of the script that caused the problem. I gave it a quoted date string after verifying that git could use those. Unfortunately, I didn't take into account the problem of shell quoting when that script calls another one. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
