https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68612
Dereckson <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|shell |community-consensus-needed Status|NEW |UNCONFIRMED Ever confirmed|1 |0 --- Comment #1 from Dereckson <[email protected]> --- Hello, I have a bad feeling about this request. 28 people have participated to the consultation, 18 supports the motion. So, 18 people are going to introduce the word 'moderator' in the Wikipedia universe, where: - we explain a lot to everybody there isn't any moderator on Wikipedia, ie nobody moderates the content publication, like in an editorial committee; - a Google search to wikipedia moderators give very negative and troll posts and news. I wonder if it's acceptable to let 18 person choose to introduce a word with such a negative connotation in the projects and if another name of the group wouldn't be more appropriated. Because this will have an impact in other projects: "Yes, you have moderators, see vi. for example.". Furthermore, we're here in yet another strange rights divide situation. People trusted to delete, undelete, protect articles should normally be trusted to be full sysops. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
