https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69656
--- Comment #6 from Tisza Gergő <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Derk-Jan Hartman from comment #5) > @Tisza, the better question is not if it is strictly legal or not, but > wether or not we have the moral obligation to attribute someone. The author *is* attributed - you just need to click on the "details" button to read the attribution. IMO the better question is whether placing the attribution an extra click away degrades either user or author experience. Which is a *question* - pretending it is an answer is unhelpful. Talking about license violations instead is extra unhelpful. > As I have said before, we need to stimulate the communities to cleanup their > licensing and attribution information, so that we can make views like this. The information is available in this case (cf. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Busabout_Wagga_Wagga#mediaviewer/File:Busabout_-_Bustech_VST_bodied_Mercedes-Benz_O500LE_6086MO.jpg ). I am not familiar with the design decisions of the mobile viewer; maybe the information is omitted because of the very limited amount of space. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
