https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65445
Erik Moeller <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #5 from Erik Moeller <[email protected]> --- Hi all, The {{Credit line}} template is problematic in three important ways: 1) It repeats information in an error-prone manner. Author, license and source are typically repeated and need to be maintained in two places. The result is that many {{Credit line}} invocations are actually incorrect or problematic. Here's an example call: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:WojciechowscyAttribution&action=edit As you can see, some CC licenses are linked, others aren't and the GFDL link goes to the Wikipedia article about the GFDL. This is very typical. The template attempts to substitute license names magically with links through some error prone code where a missing character will cause a license URL to be omitted. 2) In many, probably most, invocations, it adds no new information. Media Viewer already provides attribution both using the author name and source URL. Typically this results in a virtually identical credit line (both below the image and using the "Use this file" dialog). So the actual severity of this issue is being dramatically exaggerated. 3) The template, in its current form, emits all its text as a single machine-readable string. In order to display it in a manner similar to other attribution info (i.e. license in one place, author in another), the machine-readable output would need to be modified. It's not clear to us that the template in its current form should exist or should be supported. To the extent that uploaders want to provide custom attribution strings beyond source URL and author, there may be better ways to do this, so that information like license name and author name is not duplicated in two places. At minimum, we would need to address 3) - we could then ignore the problematic license string in favor to Media Viewer's own license parsing code, and substitute author/source information with the attribution string in the template. However, we think this would be a cop-out -- we should find a way to solve this problem that minimizes information repetition. None of these issues are specific to Media Viewer; they will impact all re-users of Wikimedia content. (For example, any re-user would be including error-prone licensing information by relying on "credit line" attribution strings which sometimes link to the actual license and sometimes not.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
