https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65445
--- Comment #12 from Erik Moeller <[email protected]> --- I would suggest the following changes to Media Viewer and the template: 1) In the template, emit licensetpl_attr only for the actual attribution component (which is already a separate parameter, i.e. the combination of "Author" and "Other"). License is already emitted in more predictable machine-readable form by other templates, but can still be rendered in the output for easy copy & paste. 2) If licensetpl_attr is set, prioritize it as the preferred attribution below the image and in the "Use this file" provided attribution. Note that this also addresses issues with attribution parameters provided by other templates, e.g. this file: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:(Boletus_edulis).jpg Where the licensetpl_attr metadata specifies a full author name that's not rendered in Media Viewer. Does that sound reasonable to folks on this bug? It would probably be worth rethinking the attribution concepts a bit more, but that can be done as part of the longer term structured data efforts. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
