https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66021
--- Comment #21 from Isarra <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Andre Klapper from comment #19) > I think "At this time I do not want to make an additional change to this > value since insufficient evidence that a higher contrast value provides more > benefits than drawbacks." was a clear statement and a sufficient reason to > close this ticket as RESOLVED WORKSFORME for the time being. Is a user closing a bug that doesn't even apply to them as WORKSFORME really how this is supposed to be used? Of course it works for them. This bug is here because it doesn't work for OTHER PEOPLE. I don't know what you want for sufficient evidence, either, considering I've provided more evidence for this bug than was ever provided to make the original change in the first place. If I could I'd just take my damn computer over there and SHOW you all what it looks like, but that's not really a viable option. Proper testing on a wider spread of hardware is really what we need, though, when it comes to accessibility and design-related things, but apparently that doesn't happen. > Bugzilla allows adding comments without changing the bug report status. > Furthermore, the patch has a -2 so currently there isn't a PATCH_TO_REVIEW > left... Um... it doesn't have a -2? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
