Jdforrester-WMF added a comment. >>! In T694#14544, @Qgil wrote: > One possibility could be: based on the proof of concept that bugzillapreview > is, we trust the script, and we will instruct it not to print the unnecessary > fields.
So far I've seen no issues at all in the import in terms of missing content, so this seems sensible. TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T694 REPLY HANDLER ACTIONS Reply to comment or attach files, or !close, !claim, !unsubscribe or !assign <username>. To: chasemp, Jdforrester-WMF Cc: wikibugs-l, Qgil, Aklapper, Nemo_bis, Jdforrester-WMF, chasemp _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
