Jdforrester-WMF added a comment. >>! In T694#14606, @chasemp wrote: > In regards to the principle of progressive disclosure, this not a phabricator > or migration issue. > > https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68559 looks like this: > > {F420} > > phabricator looks like > > {F422} > > > Bugzilla chooses to display fields that have no set value, I assume because > an unset field is not the same thing as //no data//. The current approach is > the least surprise approach as it most closely preserves the set of data, set > and unset, in the original bug report. Not liking it is fine, not wanting it > shown on issues people are actively working on where the value of this data > can be examined is fine. It can be removed from any description, but the > default migrated description would be missing valuable context without it.
I agree that Bugzilla is also crap at this. :-) However, we can and should do better. TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T694 REPLY HANDLER ACTIONS Reply to comment or attach files, or !close, !claim, !unsubscribe or !assign <username>. To: chasemp, Jdforrester-WMF Cc: wikibugs-l, Qgil, Aklapper, Nemo_bis, Jdforrester-WMF, chasemp _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
