https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24650

Bawolff <bawolff...@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Blocks|                            |26611

--- Comment #3 from Bawolff <bawolff...@gmail.com> 2011-01-07 15:00:06 UTC ---
>> Output of sortkey is probably pointless now...?
>Let's keep it around for back compat. It's also not totally useless (useful for
>e.g. debugging collations and the like).

How about anywhere a sortkey is displayed in the api, we now have two fields,
sortkey would be the human readable sortkey based cl_sortkey_prefix (on the
assumption that most people using the api for sortkeys currently use it to
display to user, not to sort things), and then another field, rawsortkey that
has the binary sortkey in it.

Does that sound like the right course of action?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l

Reply via email to