https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28385
--- Comment #18 from Happy-melon <[email protected]> 2011-04-02 20:24:10 UTC --- (In reply to comment #17) > > If you think that voting on bugs was the apotheosis of developer > > decision-making on Wikimedia, you are simply not inhabiting the same reality > > Correct me, if it has been removed meanwhile, but when I came to this buzilla > installation in the beginning, I read a guide about "reporting bugs" which > told > me to vote for bugs so as to raise their priority and likelyhood of assement > but to "not rely on this as automatic since developers are free to choose > themselves" which was pretty fine for me. If voting had been useless and > unwanted, it had not been announced this way and had been switched off in the > first place. So now do not blame us that we used it. Cf bug 1 :D I remember the page you're thinking of, and it did IIRC indeed say something like that. I'm not blaming anyone for anything apart from ignoring that "but to not rely on..." phrase. It's only "unwanted" in the sense that the *confusion it causes* is unwanted; other than that it's just amicably useless. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
