https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28385
--- Comment #22 from Reedy <[email protected]> 2011-04-05 10:20:59 UTC --- (In reply to comment #21) > Not sure why it requires 20 comments to say "enable the plug-in." As I recall, > the person "in charge" of Bugzilla (Mark H.) was in favor of keeping this > feature or something like it around. Until there's a better alternative, it's > simplest and sanest to enable the plug-in to restore the lost functionality. > It > should take about a minute of time and doesn't require any further discussion > about the nature of code development or the virtue of democratic systems. (In reply to comment #20) > (In reply to comment #19) > > (In reply to comment #18) > > > > > > It's only "unwanted" in the sense that the *confusion it causes* is > > > unwanted; > > > other than that it's just amicably useless. > > > > It is not useless. Two at least have expressed that they are using it, and > > it > > is useful for them. > > > > A word on "saved searches": I have ones, too. Bugzilla searches are for > > geeks > > who have lots background knowledge, or lots of time to figure things out > > despite them being pratically undocumented. They're unsuited for a mundane > > casual user, and they cannot be used to resemble the data presented by > > voting. > > > > Please stop discussing, and restore voting and votes. > > But that's not the wikipedia way. We need to argue and "vote" for it for > months > on end, to come up with "no consensus" As above. Priyanka commited in r85404, just needs pushing out to fix the bug... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
