https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30106
--- Comment #4 from Neil Kandalgaonkar <[email protected]> 2011-07-28 23:27:44 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > MediaWiki is under "GPL v2 or later", so it's actually quite fine to write a > GPLv3 extension I would imagine... it just means that the combination when you > load them together is forced to GPLv3 as well. Okay, RobLa and I just talked about this in person, and I think I understand it now. So we don't mind being open to GPLv3, in the sense that someone could write an extension that was GPLv3, and then the combination of MediaWiki plus that extension would be GPLv3. However, as a matter of WMF policy, is it correct to assume that everyone who works for us should be writing GPLv2, or just saying "this extension is licensed under the same terms as MediaWiki"? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
